What Media Bias?
Washington Examiner: Pew: Trump media three times more negative than for Obama, just 5 percent positive
The media’s coverage of President Trump has been overwhelmingly negative, more than three times more critical than the initial coverage of former President Barack Obama and twice that of former Presidents George W. Bush and Bill Clinton.
The Pew Research Center said that the early coverage of Trump was 62 percent negative. By comparison, Obama’s coverage was just 20 percent negative.
“About six-in-ten stories on Trump’s early days in office had a negative assessment, about three times more than in early coverage for Obama and roughly twice that of Bush and Clinton. Coverage of Trump’s early time in office moved further away from a focus on the policy agenda and more toward character and leadership,” said Pew.
Read more ....
WNU Editor: Coverage of the Canadian French press is 100% negative. Canadian English press around 95% negative. As an example, I watched a 5 minute discussion yesterday on CTV News between the host and a U.S. reporter on this bogus story .... Melania Trump Orders Removal of Damaged, 200-Year-Old Tree From White House Lawn (Slate). I was not aware that Melania Trump was a lumberjack.
0 Response to "What Media Bias?"
Post a Comment