Donald Trump Evan El-Amin/Shutterstock and Vladimir Putin (Kremlin)
Barbara Boland, The American Conservative: Three Glaring Problems with the Russian Taliban ‘Bounty’ Story
There seems to be a lack of sourcing and a big whiff of politics, say former intelligence officers.
A bombshell report published by The New York Times Friday alleges that Russia paid dollar bounties to the Taliban in Afghanistan to kill U.S troops. Obscured by an extremely bungled White House press response, there are at least three serious flaws with the reporting.
The article alleges that GRU, a top-secret unit of Russian military intelligence, offered the bounty in payment for every U.S. soldier killed in Afghanistan, and that at least one member of the U.S. military was alleged to have been killed in exchange for the bounties. According to the paper, U.S. intelligence concluded months ago that the Russian unit involved in the bounties was also linked to poisonings, assassination attempts and other covert operations in Europe. The Times reports that United States intelligence officers and Special Operations forces in Afghanistan came to this conclusion about Russian bounties some time in 2019.
Read more ....
WNU Editor: Only three glaring problems?!?!?!
0 Response to "There Are Three Glaring Problems With The New York Times Russian Taliban ‘Bounty’ Story"
Post a Comment