Antiwar.com: Higher Military Spending Will Save Democracy
So says the "liberal" New York Times
Three days ago, I got a story in my New York Times email feed on “A Turning Point in Military Spending.” The article celebrated the greater willingness of NATO members as well as countries like Japan to spend more on military weaponry, which, according to the “liberal” NYT, will help to preserve democracy. Interestingly, even as NATO members have started to spend more, the Pentagon is still demanding yet higher budgets, abetted by Congress. I thought if NATO spent more, the USA could finally spend less?
No matter. Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, as well as the hyping of what used to be called the “Yellow Peril,” today read “China,” is ensuring record military spending in the USA as yearly Pentagon budgets approach $900 billion. That figure does not include the roughly $120 billion or more in aid already provided to Ukraine in its war with Russia. And since the Biden administration’s commitment to Ukraine remains open-ended, you can add scores of billion more to that sum if the war persists into the fall and winter.
Read more ....
WNU Editor: It was only 5 years ago that the New York Times condemned former President Trump's push to get NATO to spend more money on defense .... Trump Warns NATO Allies to Spend More on Defense, or Else (New York Times).
0 Response to "The New York Times Wants More NATO Defense Spending!"
Post a Comment